Beck, C. T. (2019).
Secondary Qualitative Data Analysis in the Health and Social Sciences (C. T. Beck, Ed.; 1st ed.). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315098753
Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many words do we read per minute?
A review and meta-analysis of reading rate.
Journal of Memory and Language,
109, 104047.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104047
Campbell, R., Goodman-Williams, R., Engleton, J., Javorka, M., & Gregory, K. (2023). Open science and data sharing in trauma research:
Developing a trauma-informed protocol for archiving sensitive qualitative data.
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy,
15(5), 819–828.
https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001358
Campbell, R., Goodman-Williams, R., Javorka, M., Engleton, J., & Gregory, K. (2023). Understanding
Sexual Assault Survivors’
Perspectives on
Archiving Qualitative Data:
Implications for
Feminist Approaches to
Open Science.
Psychology of Women Quarterly,
47(1), 51–64.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221131546
Douglas, B. D., McGorray, E. L., & Ewell, P. J. (2021). Some researchers wear yellow pants, but even fewer participants read consent forms:
Exploring and improving consent form reading in human subjects research.
Psychological Methods,
26(1), 61–68.
https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000267
Fichtner, U. A., Horstmeier, L. M., Brühmann, B. A., Watter, M., Binder, H., & Knaus, J. (2023). The role of data sharing in survey dropout: A study among scientists as respondents.
Journal of Documentation,
79(4), 864–879.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2022-0135
Geier, C., Adams, R. B., Mitchell, K. M., & Holtz, B. E. (2021). Informed
Consent for
Online Research—
Is Anybody Reading?:
Assessing Comprehension and
Individual Differences in
Readings of
Digital Consent Forms.
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,
16(3), 154–164.
https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211020160
Ittenbach, R. F., Senft, E. C., Huang, G., Corsmo, J. J., & Sieber, J. E. (2015). Readability and
Understanding of
Informed Consent Among Participants With Low Incomes:
A Preliminary Report.
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,
10(5), 444–448.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615615006
Kamath, Y. V., Shetty, Y. C., Lanjewar, I. C., & Kulkarni, A. (2025). Readability of informed consent documents and its impact on consent refusal rate.
Perspectives in Clinical Research,
16(1), 38–43.
https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_322_23
Kuula, A. (2011). Methodological and
Ethical Dilemmas of
Archiving Qualitative Data.
IASSIST Quarterly,
34(3-4), 12.
https://doi.org/10.29173/iq455
Lamb, D., Russell, A., Morant, N., & Stevenson, F. (2024). The challenges of open data sharing for qualitative researchers.
Journal of Health Psychology,
29(7), 659–664.
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241237620
Masson, M. E. J. (1983). Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading.
Memory & Cognition,
11(3), 262–274.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196973
Mozersky, J., Parsons, M., Walsh, H., Baldwin, K., McIntosh, T., & DuBois, J. M. (2020). Research
Participant Views regarding
Qualitative Data Sharing.
Ethics & Human Research,
42(2), 13–27.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500044
Parfenova, D., Niftulaeva, A., & Carr, C. T. (2024). Words, words, words: Participants do not read consent forms in communication research.
Communication Research Reports, 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2024.2379832
Pedersen, E. R., Neighbors, C., Tidwell, J., & Lostutter, T. W. (2011). Do
Undergraduate Student Research Participants Read Psychological Research Consent Forms?
Examining Memory Effects,
Condition Effects, and
Individual Differences.
Ethics & Behavior,
21(4), 332–350.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2011.585601
Perrault, E. K., & Keating, D. M. (2018). Seeking
Ways to
Inform the
Uninformed:
Improving the
Informed Consent Process in
Online Social Science Research.
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,
13(1), 50–60.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617738846
Pietrzykowski, T., & Smilowska, K. (2021). The reality of informed consent: Empirical studies on patient comprehension—systematic review.
Trials,
22(1), 57.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04969-w
Steinhardt, I., Fischer, C., Heimstädt, M., Hirsbrunner, S. D., İkiz-Akıncı, D., Kressin, L., Kretzer, S., Möllenkamp, A., Porzelt, M., Rahal, R.-M., Schimmler, S., Wilke, R., & Wünsche, H. (2021).
Opening up and Sharing Data from Qualitative Research: A Primer: Results of a workshop run by the research group ,,Digitalization and Science“ at the Weizenbaum Institute in Berlin on January 17, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.34669/WI.WS/17
Stieglitz, S., Wilms, K., Mirbabaie, M., Hofeditz, L., Brenger, B., López, A., & Rehwald, S. (2020). When are researchers willing to share their data? –
Impacts of values and uncertainty on open data in academia.
PLOS ONE,
15(7), e0234172.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234172
Ulrich, C. M., Ratcliffe, S. J., Hochheimer, C. J., Zhou, Q., Huang, L., Gordon, T., Knafl, K., Richmond, T., Schapira, M. M., Miller, V., Mao, J. J., Naylor, M., & Grady, C. (2024). Informed
Consent among
Clinical Trial Participants with
Different Cancer Diagnoses.
AJOB Empirical Bioethics,
15(3), 165–177.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2023.2262992
VandeVusse, A., Mueller, J., & Karcher, S. (2022). Qualitative
Data Sharing:
Participant Understanding,
Motivation, and
Consent.
Qualitative Health Research,
32(1), 182–191.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211054058
Wisgalla, A., & Hasford, J. (2022). Four reasons why too many informed consents to clinical research are invalid: A critical analysis of current practices.
BMJ Open,
12(3), e050543.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050543
Xu, A., Baysari, M. T., Stocker, S. L., Leow, L. J., Day, R. O., & Carland, J. E. (2020). Researchers’ views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: A qualitative study.
BMC Medical Ethics,
21(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00538-7
Zuiderwijk, A., Shinde, R., & Jeng, W. (2020). What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data?
A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption.
PLOS ONE,
15(9), e0239283.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239283